stinger78
Helluva Engineer
- Messages
- 10,597
Yes, but apparently the tie break rules don’t include w/l against tied teams.dook is 0-1 so they get to go apparently.
Yes, but apparently the tie break rules don’t include w/l against tied teams.dook is 0-1 so they get to go apparently.
Why have head to head records as a criteria if you don’t use it?Yes, but apparently the tie break rules don’t include w/l against tied teams.
Also we lost a close game, others got blown out, but I would not be surprised to see us go unranked cause CFP hates us.One good thing
If SMU loses
We’ve alr had Tennessee, ASU, and Pitt lose
All four of them are immediately in front of us
So I honestly think the committee might give us credit for playing tough with Georgia. Yes we lost to Pitt, but Georgia is a quality loss for sure and we are 9-3.
Well, for starters, it took us 3 weeks into the season to learn how to snap the ball and even then we've had sporadic bad snaps even in the last game. We also never really seemed to figure out where Pitt and UGA were bringing pressure from. Those are good defenses and they make that difficult, but it looked like we failed to check into the right protections repeatedly. That's on someone, usually also the center.Thanks for educating me....means alot ......
Humor me Stech while I make one more point....when you guys write, "Our OL stinks".....I must ask, well, WHO. exaactly.?..which one?...name a name...'m sure Stech knows this already, but the OL is made up of FIVE different guys...in our 2025 rotation, there are six....so do they all 6 "stink" equally? Or is it one particular OLman killing us while the others are OK? Let's call his fat *** out and humiliate him properly!
Oh well, what do I know about OL play...except it is always their fault when we lose...
One in each side of the ball.Weight is a non issue. The shape of a football and the position of the football when a player lands are what matter. The chip would need to cover the entire surface of the ball to be valid. Also the line to gain would need to be hooked up to a system that accurately marked the line to gain.
Is it possible, probably though not easily as there are many variables involved. However it is not something that could be easily done that actually improves the game by a significant margin.
There are likely some techies working on it in garages though! If someone comes up with a solution they might become wealthy quickly!
With all due respect…how many beers??I think it’s just time for the UGA and Georgia Tech rivalry to end UGA has won this game for the last eight years now not to say anything against Georgia Tech but to keep up with the recruiting and having the talent with Georgia will not be probably possible in the state of Georgia do the fact that Georgia will get more money than Georgia Tech in the NIL funds as Georgia Tech focuses more on academics which is awesome which I think it should be .. Georgia Tech is highly Pro academic schools in the nation in the world. plus more and more you go to these games there’s more Georgia fans than actually tech fans because More of Georgia fans come out and dominate every stadium that Georgia Georgia Tech plays so it’s basically a home game for Georgia no matter what whether it be in Atlanta or being in Athens because more of their fans focus more on the athletics part which is fine I just think that this role in Georgia Tech needs to focus more on the ACC because the ACC is getting better and better each year and would like to see them focus more on that conference and just forget about this game and see what they can do with the ACC and go from there just my opinion
Bueller? Bueller?I think it’s just time for the UGA and Georgia Tech rivalry to end UGA has won this game for the last eight years now not to say anything against Georgia Tech but to keep up with the recruiting and having the talent with Georgia will not be probably possible in the state of Georgia do the fact that Georgia will get more money than Georgia Tech in the NIL funds as Georgia Tech focuses more on academics which is awesome which I think it should be .. Georgia Tech is highly Pro academic schools in the nation in the world. plus more and more you go to these games there’s more Georgia fans than actually tech fans because More of Georgia fans come out and dominate every stadium that Georgia Georgia Tech plays so it’s basically a home game for Georgia no matter what whether it be in Atlanta or being in Athens because more of their fans focus more on the athletics part which is fine I just think that this role in Georgia Tech needs to focus more on the ACC because the ACC is getting better and better each year and would like to see them focus more on that conference and just forget about this game and see what they can do with the ACC and go from there just my opinion
As a fan since 1970 I can objectively say if you watched us against BC, NC State and Pitt it’s hard to make a case for us being ranked. One “quality” loss against UGA doesn’t come close to making up for those performances. If we have a great showing in the Holiday (or any bowl) we can have that discussion then.Also we lost a close game, others got blown out, but I would not be surprised to see us go unranked cause CFP hates us.
I suspect you mean each end. Of course the center of the ball is not a point. It likely can be done but it won’t be all everyone hopes forOne in each side of the ball.
Basically every single team ranked in the CFP had at least one close game against a much inferior teamAs a fan since 1970 I can objectively say if you watched us against BC, NC State and Pitt it’s hard to make a case for us being ranked. One “quality” loss against UGA doesn’t come close to making up for those performances. If we have a great showing in the Holiday (or any bowl) we can have that discussion then.
Yeah, I mean it’s better than 7-6. But the collapse down the stretch will always be the talking point. And it’s not simply that they lost. It’s the way they lost in those games. We didn’t simply get beat by teams that were better than us. We made a ton of mistakes or played with little effort with large portions of our team in four straight games and nearly went 0-4 after starting 8-0. There were bright spots in there for sure, but the team collectively played poorly over that stretch and lost three winnable games as a result.Listen to yourself. We just won 9 regular season games for the first time in over a decade, and only the 4th time in 25 years.
A very small jump maybe???Yeah, I mean it’s better than 7-6. But the collapse down the stretch will always be the talking point. And it’s not simply that they lost. It’s the way they lost in those games. We didn’t simply get beat by teams that were better than us. We made a ton of mistakes or played with little effort with large portions of our team in four straight games and nearly went 0-4 after starting 8-0. There were bright spots in there for sure, but the team collectively played poorly over that stretch and lost three winnable games as a result.
Looking back, we had a little luck to get to 8-0. But that’s how it always works. Then when presented with an opportunity we didn’t lose due to unlucky breaks. We lost because we played poorly. We simply didn’t take advantage of the opportunity presented to us. In the end, we were equally as inconsistent as we were in 2023 and 2024…we simply had all of our bad at the same time.
So yeah, it’s hard to get excited about the holistic results from the season. And I guarantee the team feels the same way. Ask yourself this - do you think Brent Key feels like we made “the jump?” I’m betting he doesn’t.
Key focuses on how well the team plays, and believes outcomes will come from preparing and executing the right way. It’s an outcome of the Saban system.Yeah, I mean it’s better than 7-6. But the collapse down the stretch will always be the talking point. And it’s not simply that they lost. It’s the way they lost in those games. We didn’t simply get beat by teams that were better than us. We made a ton of mistakes or played with little effort with large portions of our team in four straight games and nearly went 0-4 after starting 8-0. There were bright spots in there for sure, but the team collectively played poorly over that stretch and lost three winnable games as a result.
Looking back, we had a little luck to get to 8-0. But that’s how it always works. Then when presented with an opportunity we didn’t lose due to unlucky breaks. We lost because we played poorly. We simply didn’t take advantage of the opportunity presented to us. In the end, we were equally as inconsistent as we were in 2023 and 2024…we simply had all of our bad at the same time.
So yeah, it’s hard to get excited about the holistic results from the season. And I guarantee the team feels the same way. Ask yourself this - do you think Brent Key feels like we made “the jump?” I’m betting he doesn’t.
Bunny hopA very small jump maybe???
This is not the same outcome. We didn’t lose 50-0.Some us are just tired my guy. We wanna see Tech win. Same as you. Tired of the same outcome year in year out
It continues to amaze me how many of our folks think we should be beating UGAg on a biannual basis. Literally no one else but Alabama has done that in over 10 years now. Yet our folks get PO’ed because we lose that game. Yes, it stinks and yes we did beat them last year but didn’t get the W.
Chan has gone on record as saying he cares about winning the ACC more than beating the mutts, There is ZERO chance Brent Key cares more about the ACC than that gameNo matter how you slice it, Key is 0-4 against LOLuga. I really don’t need to see Chan Gailey part 2 electric boogaloo.
I think it's the fact that teams get close against them, but something keeps them from getting over that hump, Be it coaching, Refs, or TalentIt continues to amaze me how many of our folks think we should be beating UGAg on a biannual basis. Literally no one else but Alabama has done that in over 10 years now. Yet our folks get PO’ed because we lose that game. Yes, it stinks and yes we did beat them last year but didn’t get the W.