Maddox has put the ball on the ground too often than not when he had opportunities this year. He needs to make sure he protects the ball more.If we are truly going to run the bawl, then we need to teach our OL to drive block. There comes a time when you just have to knock your man off the ball. Too often we couldn't do it this year - especially in the RZ. We also need to get Maddox ready to play a lot more than he has.
Good post. Buster did change O because of that int problem.You can’t really use King’s interceptions as proof of anything. We can all see that after his first season that Faulkner completely changed the entire passing game because of King’s interception rate. We simply stopped throwing downfield except in obvious situations like the first drive Friday. And you can tell it was drilled in King’s head to miss long as he missed a lot of receivers long this year. I’m not commenting on if I agree or not but Faulkner changed the entire passing game which is why we threw more passes behind the LOS than past the first down marker. This is also why Birr set a GT record for field goals. When the field shrunk Faulkner did not trust the passing game except when we were so far behind we had to throw like the 2 TD’s to Canion against Pitt. We never saw those type of play calls until we absolutely needed them. We won 9 games so I can’t say it wasn’t the right call but sometimes you gotta take risks to win big.
1. Is there a source or is this word of mouth?Auburn buzz is that they talked to Key, they were impressed, but that he didn’t want to leave Tech.
Tennessee was a lot like us this year pretty good offense but at times their defense could not stop the other team,Tennessee i much better than Temple. Louisville is better than NCST. The others do seem similar
I just don't see them as a different tier of opponent. They're the 9th and 10th place teams in the ACC standings this year, and we're trading a road game against one for a home game against the other.Louisville is better than NCST.
One advantage we have next year is we actually have 7 home games at Bobby Dodd. Hopefully getting rid of the MBS game will help. The away schedule looks a little challenging. UGA, Clemson, Pitt, VT (would expect more from them with Franklin as coach), Stanford (ACC teams have struggled traveling to the West Coast). I would guess we would be underdogs for the first three away teams.We still don’t have Miami or SMU next year, but 5 out of our 8 ACC opponents next year are going bowling this year. No one can predict anything with the portal, but I actually don’t know if our ACC schedule will be that much more difficult next year than it was this year. Non-conference is brutal with 3 P4 teams. As I type this, I am realizing I don’t think these observations are adding much to the conversation lol
Well … in hindsight it does look that way. But coaching staffs are nothing if not inherently conservative. They had won playing D "B, not B" and there really wasn't any reason to expect that things would get better playing otherwise. Until the Pitt game when we got into a 28 - 0 hole and had to fight out of it.So a few things - The Pitt game went a little different then you are explaining it. The entire team played poorly for the first 1.5 quarters, not just the D.
But if we are just focusing on D then you are glossing over how poor they looked in the second half against BC doing the same crap they did against NC State and eventually Pitt. If we truly decided to wait and see if Pitt were going to do the same thing then that is very poor prep by the staff.
You left out Wake. Dickrert is a very dangerous coach as is his DC.The ACC future will be interesting. My off the top thoughts.
Teams with a chance to be good
- Clemson will be good but I think their days as a true NC level team are over
- Miami - I think they have the highest ceiling. They are stacked with talent. QB play has been an issue and Christobal dumb decisions have clearly cost them games, huge potential
- SMU will be a good and dangerous team. Lashley is a good coach and they have tons of money
- Louisville, I believe in Brohm. If he can get a QB for more than 1 year that will make a big difference in their consistency.
- GT, maybe, if we get enough money to pay for more very good players. I like the coaching staff a lot
- FSU - it will take dumping Norvell and a few years to get them on track. Lots of potential with very poor results the past 2 years
- VT - I believe Franklin will be their answer
The rest are a big jumble that can have good years but will still struggle with consistent seasons. I hope GT does not drop into this group. We easily could.
On various Auburn boards as part of larger updates.1. Is there a source or is this word of mouth?
2. Interviewing - I'm not sure what I expect for an answer here, but what's the point of interviewing if you're content with your current job? Is it to build good relationships in case something goes wrong at the current position? Is it just good practice/considered rude to turn down that offer to interview?
But Tennessee is also Power 4 and SEC. A win over them helps more than a win over Temple.Tennessee i much better than Temple. Louisville is better than NCST. The others do seem similar
Their redeeming qualities are the distilleries!Who would want to be anything in Kentucky? Kentucky's redeeming quality is it's not Indiana.
Mehe, can't stand bourbon. It's just bad scotch.Their redeeming qualities are the distilleries!
Nothing wrong in taking an interview. It’s all about connections. What if Cabrera left for Stanford and we got another Peterson in there. What decent coach, even a GT alum, would want to work in an antagonistic atmosphere? Johnson was able to do it because he was an older guy near the end who ran his own thing. As quickly as things went from the other coach to now it can go bad even quicker. Take a look at Ole Miss. Their staff and roster are about to be decimated. They will go from an 11 win team to a 5 win team in just a few months.1. Is there a source or is this word of mouth?
2. Interviewing - I'm not sure what I expect for an answer here, but what's the point of interviewing if you're content with your current job? Is it to build good relationships in case something goes wrong at the current position? Is it just good practice/considered rude to turn down that offer to interview?
Recruiting has to get better
Coaching on one side of the ball has to get better
Otherwise we will be tech average
But Tennessee is also Power 4 and SEC. A win over them helps more than a win over Temple.
But Tennessee is also Power 4 and SEC. A win over them helps more than a win over Temple.
Copper Tubing and YeastSo they are buying a lot more copper wire and yeast?