Coaching Search Over: Cross Hired

Root4GT

Helluva Engineer
Messages
6,025
View attachment 21219

Nebraska stuck with Hoiberg after he went 24-67 (.264) overall and 9-50 (.153) in the Big Ten in his first 3 years.

After sticking with him for 5 years, he got them back into the NCAA tournament.

After sticking with him for 7 years, he got them their first NCAA win in program history.

How fast do we expect results from our guys?
Depends on the coach. Hoiberg had already proved he could win at the P4 level at Iowa State. His record there in 5 years was 115–56 (.673). With that record at a P4 school he got a longer leash at Nebraska which is a historically poor basketball school. Before Hoiberg Nebraska has had 2 winning conference records this Century.
 

slugboy

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
13,983
Depends on the coach. Hoiberg had already proved he could win at the P4 level at Iowa State. His record there in 5 years was 115–56 (.673). With that record at a P4 school he got a longer leash at Nebraska which is a historically poor basketball school. Before Hoiberg Nebraska has had 2 winning conference records this Century.
I’m sure the buyout cost and the dumpster fire at the football program at the same time shielded him.
 

slugboy

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
13,983
Seems like the forum is a few weeks ahead of the reputable media


Sources: Georgia Tech is targeting Troy’s Scott Cross as the school’s new basketball coach. A deal is expected to come together in the near future. Cross led Troy to consecutive NCAA bids. He’s won 350 career Division I games, spanning 19 seasons at UT Arlington and Troy. He’s won 20 games in five consecutive seasons and has eight 20-win seasons in the last 10 years.
 

DTechster

Georgia Tech Fan
Messages
6
I'm not sure if it will be a great, good or bad hire, but the perceived process seems lazy.

“Perceived” being the key word here. Alpert kept things quiet throughout so we really have no idea what the process actually entailed and who was involved. I would say calling the perceived process “lazy” is a lazy take. He handled it the right way.

Now, we may not like the result but hope we do in time.
 

AUFC

Helluva Engineer
Messages
4,543
Location
Atlanta
I'm not sure if it will be a great, good or bad hire, but the perceived process seems lazy.
You’re entitled to perceive what you perceive but my own perception is that Alpert went to high demand targets, they told him to **** off, and then he interviewed several less proven, less in-demand candidates who were willing to take a chance on our job. Seems fine to me.

If Stansbury came with $10m of upfront NIL I still would have gone with him. Not sure if that was truly ever a thing or not. With Cross, we are probably getting a team pretty similar to this year’s team with new names and faces similar to Chas Kelley, Lamar Washington, and a few Troy guys.
 

kg01

Get-Bak! Coach
Featured Member
Messages
17,844
Location
Atlanta
Listen, I can see legit reasons for skepticism (57 percent winning percentage at mid majors, 0-3 in the NCAAT) but the dude has coached 600 games. You can't base an opinion on just one.
'Scuse me, sir, but ....

i do GIF



Parks And Recreation Lmlml GIF
 

AUFC

Helluva Engineer
Messages
4,543
Location
Atlanta
I’m gonna throw this out there: if you can’t get donors to spend on the team, it’s time to do some really outside the box stuff with scheduling to hopefully get students and donors behind Cross.

Schedule St. John’s on opening night next season in McCamish and give them 3 free buy games in Carnesecca/MSG in 2027, 2028, and 2029. The dumbest thing we could do at this point is schedule 10 Patriot League and MEAC schools in non-conference and lose to 1 or 2 of them. If you need to give the high majors insane incentives to agree to a game in McCamish, just do it.
 

Root4GT

Helluva Engineer
Messages
6,025
Is it a better idea to look at the guy winning the Sun Belt, losing 4 starters to the portal, replacing them and winning the Sun Belt the next year or looking at one tournament game? I really don't think I know if he'd be any good at GT but I am pretty sure the one game isn't the best metric.
It is not a good metric. On the other hand it does not give the fan base much to be encouraged by as most of us had not heard of Cross and that is the only game we have seen a Cross coached team play.

Emotions matter to fans. Logic says he is a decent coach with a solid lower level record. Emotions say, oh my, his team looked awful yesterday.

He will get a shot at GT if hired. He lost some fan support yesterday.
 

ESPNjacket

Helluva Engineer
Messages
1,813
It is not a good metric. On the other hand it does not give the fan base much to be encouraged by as most of us had not heard of Cross and that is the only game we have seen a Cross coached team play.

Emotions matter to fans. Logic says he is a decent coach with a solid lower level record. Emotions say, oh my, his team looked awful yesterday.

He will get a shot at GT if hired. He lost some fan support yesterday.
Every one he lost yesterday is a loser.
 

4shotB

Helluva Engineer
Retired Staff
Messages
6,972
I still contend instead of half-assing it year after year, we should whole *** it with a zero budget, save money and then buy an NCAAT team every once in a while.
Actually I agree in today's environment. half-assing today costs millions and as we just saw, with absolutely nothing to show for it. Last place should be purchased without a massive squandering of scarce resources. Even committing half (give or take) of what your competitors do is a fool's errand. The people in charge should be smarter than this.
 
Top