Finishing a metric vs. committee seeding analysis I started before tourney seeding (
here). I wanted to do this before games got started but had to get work done so I could go to the game today

. Ignore this post if you are not a metrics/stat person. Forgive any fat finger errors, I did a cursory look at accuracy but I don't get paid to do this. No AI bot was harmed or abused in this analysis. Numbers are rounded.
I analyzed the relative strength of the three metrics the committee can use (RPI, KPI, and DSR) by averaging them together and using various comparisons with actual seeding (top 32) and overall region/super region strength.
tldr;
Seeding Awards
The I got gifted my seed by the committee award: UC Santa Barbara (Texas Region) +15 seeding spots -- Honorable Mention: Boston College (Georgia Region) +10 spots
The committee gave me the finger for some reason...hmmm award: Oklahoma (GT Region) -5 seeding spots
Region Awards
The I gave the committee money and BJs to get my regional draw award: Texas (110 avg. metric strength of #2-#4 region seeds)
The committee shafted me worse than Ma Tech could given my seed award: North Carolina (53 avg. region metric strength and should have been 1 seed higher) -- Kansas, Southern Miss., and Texas A&M all had ~50 avg. region metrics but were much lower top 16 seeds)
Super Regional Awards
The committee wanted me to run through my super region faster than a hot dog from Sanford stadium award: (tie) Texas/Oregon, Auburn/Nebraska (103 avg. metric strength)
The "And it figures..." award: North Carolina/Texas A&M (52 avg. metric strength)
/tldr;
Here is the summary of super regional breakdowns and average difficulty based on strength. Easier regions have higher avg. strength and harder regions have lower avg. strength. In a perfect world as you go from #1 seed super region to #8 seed super region the difficulty should get harder (lower avg. strength) but should be a small gradual jump between each seed. But as you can see the North Carolina #5 Super Region has twice the difficulty as Texas #6 and Auburn #4. (Note that the top 16 seeds metric averages are not computed in the super region strength as 1) the difficulty calculation is for that top 16 seeds and 2) including their calculations are pretty much a wash considering their actual seeds don't deviate significantly from their metric seeds. Exception to that is Oregon and Southern Miss. who both got bumped 6 or 7 seeds. So that could have made the Texas and Florida super regions slightly easier)
In the above table, blue super regions are the UCLA side of bracket and gold (ok more yellow than old gold) is GTs side. I know people didn't care if we got the #1 or #2 seed, but we got the tougher side by being #2. And I still contend that Texas is the one team we don't want to meet in a series or couple of games (double elimination) against their best pitchers. But, maybe we get lucky and they have to burn their pitchers on other teams before we see them (provided we all make it). If we get to the title series, I do not fear anyone on the other side of the bracket.
And here is the metric breakdown if you are interested: