devcon
Jolly Good Fellow
- Messages
- 194
Radio team said Brent Key picked up Vahn's HR ball.
Radio team said Brent Key picked up Vahn's HR ball.
As techbball21 mentioned, Kyle Peterson said that Auburn felt it was important to keep their Friday guy on Friday, their Saturday guy on Saturday, etc. rather than moving them all up one day to accommodate this week's Thursday - Saturday schedule. Unless something happens to change the plan, it sounds like they will go back to Alvarez mid-week and the normal weekend rotation will remain intact after this Easter weekend. IOW, no one is being moved out of the rotation.
ETA: I just looked at their remaining schedule, and of their remaining 7 series, 4 of them are Thursday - Saturday. So, I wonder what that means for Alvarez's usage going forward?
lol, we need to get Auburns cold weather physiologist guy (or maybe his assistant) on our staff. I kid ….. sort of. Everyone is affected different. I get it.And this is the very reason games are determined on the field of play and not on paper.
Plus I'm still a firm believer that temps play a part in the psyche of a player.
I feel like we have enough arms and quality depth to do a similar bullpen day on Saturdays while continuing to stretch out McKee and Blakely on Fridays and Sundays. Or simply just ride guys until they get in trouble and then bring in the next guy. It keeps the other team off balance while also keeping the bullpen happy with lots of guys seeing action. Unless we can find another guy like Blakely for Saturday I wouldn't mind this option.That is reasonable. In real-time, I guess I was with you. But once the pattern seemed to be keeping all guys out of the pen below 20 pitches... I felt like the 'goal' became use a lot of arms; but don't "use up" any. Somebody else will need to confirm my logic there. Is <20 plenty low to turn guys around to be available 2 days later... Game 1 v Cal??
Agree, want to see more of Charlie. He has the stuff!The whole script for me is that our pitching staff held AU to 3 runs, with only one pitcher having a rough outing. That after a weekend where we held another tourney (likely) team down with great pitching as well. Forget our hitting…we have had great hitting in many prior years…but it often gets silenced by greta pitching in the post-season. BUT, if your pitching continues at this level….wowza!
PS-it was VERY good to see Wilcox not only get an inning but for him to produce a 1-2-3 inning at that! Let’s see more of this kid. And Underood baffles me…he seems to get to 0-2 immediately on EVERY hitter, but fails to put them away. I’m not sure what the problem is, but getting to 0-2 right off the bat against just about EVERY hitter tells me he has some good stuff….
To be fair, I was surprised with the move to use Loy last night. I could be wrong, but I don't think we would've done that last season with Patel (just as an example). Another reason I like Loy in that reliever spot. I assume that means Loy won't be starting Friday night.
Wasn't able to watch last night, but from a stats review perspective it was great to see our guys throwing strikes. 16 pitches to get 5 outs for Loy, and then Barfield got 3 outs with 8 pitches. Someone else got 3 outs with 8 pitches. I did watch a highlight reel and saw Spivey hitting 96 mph on his fastball in that last inning. Super happy to see good performances coming out of the pen.The whole script for me is that our pitching staff held AU to 3 runs, with only one pitcher having a rough outing. That after a weekend where we held another tourney (likely) team down with great pitching as well. Forget our hitting…we have had great hitting in many prior years…but it often gets silenced by greta pitching in the post-season. BUT, if your pitching continues at this level….wowza!
PS-it was VERY good to see Wilcox not only get an inning but for him to produce a 1-2-3 inning at that! Let’s see more of this kid. And Underood baffles me…he seems to get to 0-2 immediately on EVERY hitter, but fails to put them away. I’m not sure what the problem is, but getting to 0-2 right off the bat against just about EVERY hitter tells me he has some good stuff….
The whole script for me is that our pitching staff held AU to 3 runs, with only one pitcher having a rough outing. That after a weekend where we held another tourney (likely) team down with great pitching as well. Forget our hitting…we have had great hitting in many prior years…but it often gets silenced by greta pitching in the post-season. BUT, if your pitching continues at this level….wowza!
PS-it was VERY good to see Wilcox not only get an inning but for him to produce a 1-2-3 inning at that! Let’s see more of this kid. And Underood baffles me…he seems to get to 0-2 immediately on EVERY hitter, but fails to put them away. I’m not sure what the problem is, but getting to 0-2 right off the bat against just about EVERY hitter tells me he has some good stuff….
The whole script for me is that our pitching staff held AU to 3 runs, with only one pitcher having a rough outing. That after a weekend where we held another tourney (likely) team down with great pitching as well. Forget our hitting…we have had great hitting in many prior years…but it often gets silenced by greta pitching in the post-season. BUT, if your pitching continues at this level….wowza!
PS-it was VERY good to see Wilcox not only get an inning but for him to produce a 1-2-3 inning at that! Let’s see more of this kid. And Underood baffles me…he seems to get to 0-2 immediately on EVERY hitter, but fails to put them away. I’m not sure what the problem is, but getting to 0-2 right off the bat against just about EVERY hitter tells me he has some good stuff….
Wasn't able to watch last night, but from a stats review perspective it was great to see our guys throwing strikes.
Come on, man. Leave the Nats alone.1. It's baseball. The Nats beat the Dodgers sometimes.
Come on, man. Leave the Nats alone.
Nobody (especially me....a Nats fan) has a problem with a 10 year rebuild. And I'm being mean to the Nats... it's actually 2 back-to-back 5 year rebuilds while a "Team is FOR SALE" sign comes & goes every now & then.
![]()
Funny enough I'd been using the Marlins for that example forever, but had to switch it up bc they're looking too good right now.
Eh, at least your owner isn't spending $300 - $400M per year for the same results...Come on, man. Leave the Nats alone.
Nobody (especially me....a Nats fan) has a problem with a 10 year rebuild. And I'm being mean to the Nats... it's actually 2 back-to-back 5 year rebuilds while a "Team is FOR SALE" sign comes & goes every now & then.
![]()