Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Golden Tornadoes" data-source="post: 1168907" data-attributes="member: 5881"><p>At this point, talent development should be what we are aiming for. We aren't spending money like other schools, so why try to play their game? Find lesser-known talent, develop them, and try to win in 2-3 years provided they are still here. Once we start winning, then maybe we can convince people to spend on the program. To me, this is a crossroads hire. Are we willing to give this guy a little bit to build the program and turn it into a consistent winner that will attract money? Or do we squeeze out the resources, complain when we lose, and fire the guy 3 years in and find ourselves even further behind the proverbial 8-ball? I'm fine losing for a short time if I see development and proof of concept. When CDS kept losing without development or proof of concept, that's when I knew he had to go.</p></blockquote><p></p>

Verification: Which team did Georgia Tech defeat in Aer Lingus College Football Classic 2024?