roadkill
Helluva Engineer
- Messages
- 2,770
Yes, the correlation should be intuitive to most. But some pooh-pooh the recruit rankings as not reflecting reality, or not being a useful indicator of, well, anything. I'm simply pointing out that rankings, in composite, are validated by the graph. There will always be some Mendozas as exceptions. I’m hoping we have a few of those on our team now.I would suggest that it supports the top of the star rating system, the top 50-150 players who largely get scattered across those top programs, and who accumulate in significant numbers there over 3-4 years. Those who most all who have eyes can see on a football field.
Saying those guys will make it big as college players is profoundly stating the obvious, like proudly proclaiming water is wet.
It’s the rest of the 2500-3000 or so guys that cannot be accurately predicted. Like the “scouts” who assigned Fernando Mendoza a 2* rating.
Speaking of our team, if you look at a breakdown by year of our Talent Composite, it shows a generally positive trend for the period in question. Not knocking our overachiever coach (CPJ), but for reference, his talent composite at the end of his tenure (2018) was 83.84.